Greed
The context of this may remain unclear to all but the people I have debated with on the topic of commercials. In short, they argued that commercials are monstruous and I - that they are OK. They(the people) have of course the full freedom to disagree with this simplistic presentation of our long arguments.
Generally, I regard commercials in two ways - as a background noise (annoying but inevitable consequence of our choice to live in cities) and as communication messages. Both ways, we should accept the fact that we cannot limit advertising in any way without infringing the freedom to communicate. It would be the same if we tried to make people at the marketplace to shut up and stay quiet. The fact that the marketplace has become so immense that it has creeped into almost all places of our reality is a simple effect of three things - the egoistic human nature, the competitive basis of Western culture rooted in the Greek manner of thinking and the general trend of scale increase. The latter on second thought being based on the second. We cannot limit advertisement too much, because it would put at risk basic principles, and we cannot change our millenia-formed manner of thinking. The simple conclusion is that we therefore have no other choice but to accept the ever growing number and aggresiveness of commercials.
However, some time ago - I do not remeber when - I saw for the first time a billboard with a commercial of a medicine, which provided you with the opportunity of eating a lot without feeling bad afterwards. A bit later I've also noticed the commercial of another thingy, suposed to prevent hangover after an alcohol abuse. And a few days ago there was another billboard saying something like "more sex? again? oh yes!" - it was of course another substance sold in pharmacies, allowing you to have more than you are supposed to and than your body wants (mind you - I do not say "need", I say "want").
Should I surrender and admit my friends were right? Admit that commercials promote this unsatiable way of thinking? Or are they just a media which reflects and transmits a reality, which exists anyhow and which we agree in disliking? I have just fully realized that the problem is not the commercials but the fact that such things exist. The greed that made them come into existence is the same thing that made commercials to be so numerous and aggresive - there are too many things, not too many commercials. And it is something, which is present in human nature. Being present in human nature it infiltrates human deeds, advertising being among them.
I have had also another debate - a friend argued that the four plate cooker is something ultimately unnecessary and of the same nature I attribute to the "more sex, food and alcohol" thingies. I still insist they are not of the same nature. Not everything, which is not necessary, is necessarily bad. We have even the legitimate right to enjoy unnecesary objects. It is not good, but it is not bad either. What I am talking about - the things I mentioned - go far beyond being unnecessary. They are violent, a simple demonstration of rude power, which will finally ruin both our bodies and minds. Why do we create them?
Generally, I regard commercials in two ways - as a background noise (annoying but inevitable consequence of our choice to live in cities) and as communication messages. Both ways, we should accept the fact that we cannot limit advertising in any way without infringing the freedom to communicate. It would be the same if we tried to make people at the marketplace to shut up and stay quiet. The fact that the marketplace has become so immense that it has creeped into almost all places of our reality is a simple effect of three things - the egoistic human nature, the competitive basis of Western culture rooted in the Greek manner of thinking and the general trend of scale increase. The latter on second thought being based on the second. We cannot limit advertisement too much, because it would put at risk basic principles, and we cannot change our millenia-formed manner of thinking. The simple conclusion is that we therefore have no other choice but to accept the ever growing number and aggresiveness of commercials.
However, some time ago - I do not remeber when - I saw for the first time a billboard with a commercial of a medicine, which provided you with the opportunity of eating a lot without feeling bad afterwards. A bit later I've also noticed the commercial of another thingy, suposed to prevent hangover after an alcohol abuse. And a few days ago there was another billboard saying something like "more sex? again? oh yes!" - it was of course another substance sold in pharmacies, allowing you to have more than you are supposed to and than your body wants (mind you - I do not say "need", I say "want").
Should I surrender and admit my friends were right? Admit that commercials promote this unsatiable way of thinking? Or are they just a media which reflects and transmits a reality, which exists anyhow and which we agree in disliking? I have just fully realized that the problem is not the commercials but the fact that such things exist. The greed that made them come into existence is the same thing that made commercials to be so numerous and aggresive - there are too many things, not too many commercials. And it is something, which is present in human nature. Being present in human nature it infiltrates human deeds, advertising being among them.
I have had also another debate - a friend argued that the four plate cooker is something ultimately unnecessary and of the same nature I attribute to the "more sex, food and alcohol" thingies. I still insist they are not of the same nature. Not everything, which is not necessary, is necessarily bad. We have even the legitimate right to enjoy unnecesary objects. It is not good, but it is not bad either. What I am talking about - the things I mentioned - go far beyond being unnecessary. They are violent, a simple demonstration of rude power, which will finally ruin both our bodies and minds. Why do we create them?